05/01/2013 An article appeared in yesterday's NY Times Science section about the lack of benefit and even potential harm of the routine bimanual pelvic examination in gynecology. It is so inaccurate and one sided that I have sent a letter to the Times which I have reproduced for you. (I am not optimistic that they will choose to run it.) This is such important information you may want to share it with friends, colleagues and family... All reporters and most readers appreciate there are two s...
THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE
The information on this site (or blog or article) is not a substitute for in office medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The information is provided for informational or educational purposes only